technifyed

Behavioural Economics + Psychology

Test the anchoring effect on price estimates

Show two groups a high or low number first and compare their estimates of an unrelated price.

  • DifficultyIntermediate
  • Estimated time2–7 days
  • Budget₹0
  • ClassClass 11 to college
  • Team2–3 people
  • You needNo equipment

Prerequisites: Averages

Original · by TechnifyedExperimentResearch ProjectFree to doNo equipmentResearch orientedWell documentedTwo subjects

My projects

Overview

Anchoring is the tendency for an irrelevant number to pull later estimates towards it. Give two random groups different anchors, ask the same question and compare the averages.

Why build this?

It is a famous result that reliably replicates in a classroom, and it teaches proper experimental design.

What you will learn

  • What anchoring is
  • How to assign people randomly to groups
  • How to compare group averages fairly
  • How to debrief participants

Skills you will use

Comparing two groupsRandomised experiment

Safety and ethics

  • This project involves people. Explain what you are doing and get their consent (a parent's or teacher's for children), let anyone stop at any time, collect only what you need, and remove names before you share results.

Materials and tools

  • Two versions of a one-page form
  • At least 40 volunteers

Tools and software

Spreadsheet

Expected cost₹0Nothing to buy
Estimated duration2–7 days6 build steps, plus the report

Step-by-step roadmap

  1. Start

    You will finish with: two averages, a chart and a short report with a debrief note.

  2. 1

    Prerequisites

    Know this first: averages. Then collect the 2 items in the materials list.

  3. 2

    Learn

    • What anchoring is
    • How to assign people randomly to groups
    • How to compare group averages fairly
    • How to debrief participants
  4. 3

    Plan

    Write your question, your hypothesis and the one thing you will change. Draw the table you will fill in before you start.

  5. 4

    Build

    1. Prepare two forms: one asks "Is this watch worth more or less than ₹500?", the other "…₹5,000?".
    2. Both then ask "What do you think it costs?".
    3. Hand out the forms at random, 20 of each.
    4. Collect and average the estimates for each group.
    5. Compare the averages and the spread.
    6. Explain the purpose to everyone afterwards.
  6. 5

    Test

    Random assignment matters: shuffle the forms so neither group is special.

  7. 6

    Document

    Record every reading with its unit, photograph the setup and draw a graph of the result. Report structure

  8. 7

    Present

    Explain the question, the method and the graph in two minutes; keep the setup ready to demonstrate. Presentation structure · Viva questions

  9. 8

    Publish

    Share the report and photos with your class, a science fair or your school magazine.

Expected outcome

Two averages, a chart and a short report with a debrief note.

Other versions of this project

Beginner version

Run it with one class of 20.

Advanced version

Add a no-anchor group and test whether the difference is statistically significant.

Research version

Test whether the anchor's effect is weaker for people who know the product well.

Make this project better

  1. BasicRun it with one class of 20.
  2. This projectTest the anchoring effect on price estimates
  3. AdvancedAdd a no-anchor group and test whether the difference is statistically significant.
  4. ResearchTest whether the anchor's effect is weaker for people who know the product well.

Ways to do this project

Text marked "You write this" is a prompt for your own work; everything else is specific to this project.

Problem
Does an irrelevant number shown first change people's price estimates?
Hypothesis
If people see a higher anchor, then their average estimate will be higher.
Variables
Independent: anchor value. Dependent: price estimate. Controlled: product shown, wording, setting

Observation table

You write thisDraw a table with one column for what you change, one for each repeat reading and one for the average.

Graph
You write thisPlot what you changed along the bottom and what you measured up the side; use a bar chart for categories and a line graph for numbers.
Results
You write thisState what the graph shows in one or two sentences, with numbers.
Conclusion
You write thisSay whether the result supports your hypothesis and why you think so.

Display board

  • Title and your name
  • Question
  • Hypothesis
  • Materials
  • Procedure (with photos)
  • Data table and graph
  • Conclusion
  • What you would do next

Questions judges ask

  • What is random assignment?
  • Why is the anchor irrelevant?
  • Why debrief?
  • What would you change if you did this again?
  • What was your biggest source of error, and how did you reduce it?
  • Where is this idea used in real life?

Working as a team

2–3 people. Suggested roles:

ResearchSetup and measurementData and graphsDocumentationPresentation

Report and presentation

Report structure

  1. Title and question
  2. Background: the science behind it
  3. Hypothesis
  4. Materials
  5. Method (steps, with a diagram or photo)
  6. Observations (table)
  7. Results (graph and calculation)
  8. Sources of error
  9. Conclusion
  10. What you would do next
  11. References

Presentation structure

  1. The question
  2. Why it matters
  3. The idea behind it
  4. Setup (photo)
  5. Method in three steps
  6. Results (one clear graph)
  7. What the result means
  8. Errors and limits
  9. Conclusion and next step

Viva questions

Try answering before you open each one.

What is random assignment?

Giving each person an equal chance of being in either group.

Why is the anchor irrelevant?

It carries no real information about the price.

Why debrief?

Participants deserve to know what was tested.

Where is anchoring used in shops?

"Was ₹999, now ₹499" price tags.

Resources

Source and attribution

Original

Written by Technifyed. Free to use for your own school or college project; write the report in your own words. Added 1 Oct 2026.

Similar projects

More Behavioural Economics projects

Behavioural Economics · Experiments

Run the ultimatum game with classmates

Let proposers split ten tokens and responders accept or reject, and compare the results with theory.

  • Intermediate
  • 2–7 days
  • Free
Experiment · No equipmentView

Behavioural Economics · Nudges

Design a nudge and measure its effect

Change one small thing, such as a sign or the placement of a bin, and measure whether behaviour changes.

  • Intermediate
  • 2–4 weeks
  • Under 250
Experiment · No equipmentView

Same tools

Public Health and Epidemiology + History

Map a disease outbreak like John Snow

Recreate the 1854 cholera map from public data and show how it pointed to one water pump.

  • Intermediate
  • 2–7 days
  • Free
Data Analysis · Computer onlyView

Applied Mathematics + Behavioural Economics

Analyse a simple game with game theory

Play repeated prisoner's dilemma with classmates and compare what they do with the theory.

  • Intermediate
  • 2–7 days
  • Free
Investigation · No equipmentView

Two-subject alternatives

Agri-business and Food Science + Development and Applied Economics

Follow a crop from farm to market

Track the price of one crop at each step from farmer to consumer and find who gets what share.

  • Intermediate
  • 1–2 weeks
  • Free
Field Study · No equipmentView

Finance and Banking + Development and Applied Economics

Track a virtual stock portfolio for a month

Invest imaginary money in five companies and an index, track them and explain what moved them.

  • Intermediate
  • 2–4 weeks
  • Free
Finance Project · Computer onlyView

Same difficulty and budget

Microeconomics + Marketing

Estimate the size of a local market

Estimate how much your town spends on tuition, tea or haircuts each year in two different ways.

  • Intermediate
  • 2–7 days
  • Free
Research Project · No equipmentView

Development and Applied Economics + Geography

Study rents and distance from the city centre

Collect rental listings and test whether rent per square foot falls with distance from the centre.

  • Intermediate
  • 1–2 weeks
  • Free
Data Analysis · Computer onlyView

Enter your email and the official page opens. Phone is optional.